DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE,
A G E N D A
SEPTEMBER 9, 2004
7530 Little
Road, New Port Richey, FL 34654-5598
_______________________________________________________________________________________
DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW COMMITTEE
John J.
Gallagher
County Administrator
Michael
Nurrenbrock
OMB Director
Douglas S.
Bramlett
Assistant County Administrator
(Utilities Services)
Daniel R.
Johnson
Assistant County Administrator
(Public Services)
Bipin
Parikh, P.E.
Assistant County Administrator
(Development Services)
Ray Gadd
District School Board of Pasco County
LEGAL
COUNSEL
Robert D.
Sumner
County
Attorney
ADVISORY STAFF
Cynthia M. Jolly, P.E.
Development
Director
Debra M. Zampetti
Zoning/Code
Compliance
Administrator
Vacant
Development Review
Manager
Samuel P. Steffey II
Growth Management
Administrator
James C. Widman, P.E.
Engineering
Services Director
Representative of the Clerk
of the Circuit
Court
________________________________________________________________________________________
I.
OPENING
II.
ROLL CALL
III.
MINUTES
July 15, 2004
IV.
VARIANCE PETITIONS
A.
Public Hearing
Proof of Publication
B.
Variance Review
The Development
Review Committee may grant a variance from the terms of the Land Development
Code when such variance will not be contrary to the public interest; where,
owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this
code would result in unnecessary hardship or where improved or alternative
technology would meet or exceed the development and construction standards set
forth in this code. Such variance shall
not be granted if it has the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of
this code. Furthermore, such variance
shall not be granted by the Development Review Committee unless and until a
variance application is submitted demonstrating compliance with one or more of
the following:
1.
That special conditions and circumstances exist
which are peculiar to the land, structures, or required subdivision improvements
involved, and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or required
improvements.
2.
That a literal interpretation of the provisions of
this code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other
properties with similar conditions.
3.
That the actions of the applicant did not cause the
special conditions and circumstances which necessitate the variance.
4.
That the granting of the variance requested will
not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this code
to other lands, structures, or required improvements under similar conditions.
5.
Through improved or alternative technology, the
development and construction standards set forth in this code are met or
exceeded.
6.
The Development Review Committee finds that the
requirements of this code have been met based upon the review and findings of
the Development Review Services Department and information presented at a
public hearing.
7.
The Development Review Committee further finds that
the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance
that would make possible the reasonable use of the land, buildings, or other
improvements.
8.
The Development Review Committee finds that the
granting of the variance would be in harmony with the general standards,
purpose, and intent of this code and will not be injurious to the surrounding
territory, or otherwise be detrimental to the public welfare.
9.
The Development Review Committee finds that the
granting of the variance would not violate the Goals, Objectives, and Policies
of the Comprehensive Plan.
a.
Memorandum No.: DR04‑2161
Project
Name: Brickman
Management (McDonald's)
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat
Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Brickman
Management, Inc.
Location: On the east
side of U.S. 41, approximately 450 feet north of S.R. 54, Section 25,
Township 26 South, Range 18 East.
Acreage: 0.55 Acre
Proposed
Development: Deck addition.
Requested: Variance for
concrete deck installed on west side of building.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
b.
Memorandum No.: DR04‑2302
Project
Name: Starbucks
Commissioner: The Honorable
Peter A. Altman
Applicant: Anthony
Saravanos
Location: On the west
side of U.S. 19, north of Salt Springs Boulevard, and to the southwest of
Gulf View Square Mall, Section 21, Township 25 South, Range 16
East.
Acreage: .72 Acre,
m.o.l.
Proposed
Development: Remodeling of
fast-food restaurant with coffee shop drive through.
Requested: Variance from
Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance No. 02‑04.10, perimeter landscape
buffers on north, east, and south boundaries.
RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the September 23,
2004, Development Review Committee meeting, at 1:30 p.m., in Dade City.
c.
Memorandum No.: DR04‑2295
Project
Name: Lake Talia,
Phase 2
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat
Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Priority
Developers, Inc.
Location: In Central
Pasco County, on the east and north sides of Drexel Road, approximately
one-half mile north of Lake Patience Road, Sections 13 and 14, Township 26
South, Range 18 East.
Acreage: 36.57 Acres,
m.o.l.
Proposed
Development: The developer is
requesting preliminary plan approval for the division of 36.57 acres into
74 single-family lots.
Requested: Relief from Land
Development Code, Section 306.17, Dedication; which, if approved, would
allow the developer to utilize private streets within a gated community.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
d.
Memorandum No.: DR04‑2297
Project Name: Wilderness Lake Preserve, Phase 3
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Lindell
Land Holdings, LLC
Location: In
Central Pasco County, at the ends of Grasmere Drive (Phase 2), Stoneleigh
Drive, and Citrus Blossom Drive (Phase 1), all within the Wilderness Lake
Preserve MPUD, on the east side of U.S. 41, at the intersection of
U.S. 41 and Wilderness Lake Boulevard, Section 36, Township 25
South, Range 18 East.
Acreage: 84.84 Acres,
m.o.l.
Proposed
Development: The developer is
requesting preliminary/construction plan and Stormwater Management Plan and
Report approval and amendments to portions of Phases 1 and 2 to divide
84.84 acres into 148 single-family lots.
Requested: Relief from Land
Development Code, Section 610.3, Streets, which, if approved, would allow
the developer to utilize streets classified and existing as Type 3 within
Phase 1, to service more than the maximum 100 equivalent residential
units for the connection to Phase 3.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
e.
Memorandum No.: DR04‑2299
Project
Name: Spanish Oaks
(Continued
from the August 12, 2004, Development Review Committee Meeting)
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat
Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Shady Hills, LLC
Location: On the
northeast corner of S.R. 52 and the Suncoast Parkway, Section 06,
Township 25 South, Range 18 East.
Acreage: 67.71 Acres,
m.o.l.
Proposed
Development: The applicant is
seeking approval of preliminary construction plan and Stormwater Management
Plan and Report to subdivide 67.71 acres into 262 single-family lots.
Requested: The developer is
requesting a variance from Section 3.9.2 of the Land Development Code and
Tree Protection Ordinance No. 03‑02 (Tree Replacement).
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
Pages: 1-52
V.
APPEALS
A.
Class I
None
Scheduled
B.
Class II
None
Scheduled
C.
Class III
None Scheduled
D.
Class IV
None Scheduled
E.
Consistency