DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE, PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
APRIL 15, 2004
1:30 p.m. ‑ Historic Pasco County Courthouse, Board Room, 2nd Floor,
37918 Meridian Avenue, Dade City, FL 33525
_______________________________________________________________________________________
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
John J. Gallagher
County Administrator
Michael Nurrenbrock
OMB Director
Douglas S. Bramlett
Assistant County Administrator
(Utilities Services)
Daniel R. Johnson
Assistant County Administrator
(Public Services)
Bipin Parikh, P.E.
Assistant County Administrator
(Development Services)
Michael Rapp
District School Board of Pasco County
LEGAL COUNSEL
Robert D. Sumner
County Attorney
ADVISORY STAFF
Cynthia M. Jolly, P.E.
Development Director
Debra M. Zampetti
Zoning/Code Compliance
Administrator
Ronald G. Lewis, P.E.
Development Review Manager
Samuel P. Steffey II
Growth Management Administrator
James C. Widman, P.E.
Engineering Services Director
Representative of the Clerk
of the Circuit Court
________________________________________________________________________________________
I. OPENING
II. ROLL CALL
III. MINUTES
February 26, 2004
IV. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Class III
1. Memorandum No.: GM04‑775
Project Name: Long Lake Ranch MPUD Master Planned Unit Develop-ment
(Continued from the March 25, 2004, Development Review Committee Meeting)
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location: South of S.R. 54 and 2± miles east of the Suncoast Parkway interchange, Sections 27, 28, 33, and 34, Township 26 South, Range 18 East.
Acreage: 1,032.2 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: Rezoning from A‑C Agricultural to MPUD Master Planned Unit Development.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
Pages: 1-12
V. VARIANCE PETITIONS
A. Public Hearing
Proof of Publication
B. Variance Review
The Development Review Committee may grant a variance from the terms of the Land Development Code when such variance will not be contrary to the public interest; where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this code would result in unnecessary hardship or where improved or alternative technology would meet or exceed the development and construction standards set forth in this code. Such variance shall not be granted if it has the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this code. Furthermore, such variance shall not be granted by the Development Review Committee unless and until a variance application is submitted demonstrating compliance with one or more of the following:
1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structures, or required subdivision improvements involved, and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or required improvements.
2. That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties with similar conditions.
3. That the actions of the applicant did not cause the special conditions and circumstances which necessitate the variance.
4. That the granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this code to other lands, structures, or required improvements under similar conditions.
5. Through improved or alternative technology, the development and construction standards set forth in this code are met or exceeded.
6. The Development Review Committee finds that the requirements of this code have been met based upon the review and findings of the Development Review Services Department and information presented at a public hearing.
7. The Development Review Committee further finds that the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance that would make possible the reasonable use of the land, buildings, or other improvements.
8. The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of the variance would be in harmony with the general standards, purpose, and intent of this code and will not be injurious to the surrounding territory, or otherwise be detrimental to the public welfare.
9. The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of the variance would not violate the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
a. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1187
Project Name: Best Buy Landscape Variance
(Continued from the March 11, 2004, Development Review Committee Meeting)
Commissioner: The Honorable Peter A. Altman
Applicant: Gulf View Associates, c/o Simon Property Group
Location: On the west side of U.S. 19 at Embassy Boulevard, approximately 1,145 feet south of Tacoma Drive, Section 21, Township 25 South, Range 16 East.
Acreage: 7.31 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: Retail.
Requested: Variance from Landscape Ordinance No. 02‑04, Section 7, Minimum Interior Landscaping Required for Vehicular-Use Areas, to bring 7.131 acres of the 17.53 acres into compliance and install the required building perimeter buffering.
RECOMMENDATION: Denial.
b. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1004
Project Name: Eagles Nest Condominiums Hanger Expansion
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Charles W. Brammer
Location: Approximately one-half mile east of Grand Oaks Boulevard and approximately one-half mile south of the S.R. 54 and Magnolia Boulevard intersection, Section 14, Township 26 South, Range 19 East.
Acreage: 13.92 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: Airport hangers.
Requested: Variance from Landscaping and Irrigation Ordinance No. 02‑04, Sections 6.C.9.d, 7G, 7J, 7M, 8B, 9B, and 10B.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
c. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1161
Project Name: Meadow Pointe III and IV
(Continued from the March 25, 2004, Development Review Committee Meeting)
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Clearwater Bay Associates
Location: Located in Central Pasco County, on the south side and abutting S.R. 54, extending southerly to the County line, east of the existing Meadow Pointe Subdivision, Sections 10, 15, 22, 27, 33, and 34, Township 26 South, Range 20 East.
Acreage: 2,125.2 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: An MPUD Master Planned Unit Development consisting of 4,520 single-family attached and detached units.
Requested: Relief from Ordinance No. 02‑26, Requirements for Provision and Maintenance of Neighborhood Parks.
RECOMMENDATION: To be determined based on the April 8, 2004, submission.
d. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1162
Project Name: Hamilton Park Subdivision
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Hamilton Park Developers, LLC
Location: On the north side of S.R. 54 at the intersection of S.R. 54 and New River Road, Section 13, Township 26 South, Range 20 East.
Acreage: 31.77 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The developer is requesting preliminary plan approval to divide 31.77 acres into 105 single-family detached lots.
Requested: Relief from Land Development Code Section 306.17, Dedication, which, if approved, would allow the developer to utilize private, gated streets in lieu of dedicating right-of-way to the County.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
e. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1165
Project Name: Timberwoods Estate, First Addition
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Timberwoods Holding Company, Inc.
Location: On the west side of Hays Road, approximately one-quarter mile south of Oakwood Drive, Section 23, Township 24 South, Range 17 East.
Acreage: 30.56 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The developer seeks approval of
preliminary/
construction plans and Stormwater Management Plan and Report to subdivide
30.56 acres into 13 single-family lots.
Requested: The applicant requests variances from Section 602.5, Submittal Requirements, Tree Location Survey, Tree Plan; and Section 602.7, Tree Removal and Replacement.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
f. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1167
Project Name: Oak Knoll
Commissioner: The Honorable Peter A. Altman
Applicant: Ronald Davis
Location: Approximately one-quarter mile north and three-quarters mile west of the intersection of U.S. 301 and C.R. 52A, Section 04, Township 25 South, Range 21 East.
Acreage: 21.20 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The developer received approval on February 23, 1989 (DR90‑366) to subdivide 21.20 acres into 46 single-family detached lots.
Requested: The applicant requests a variance from Section 306.3.H (Time Limit on Approval).
RECOMMENDATION: Denial.
Pages: 13-74
VI. APPEALS
A. Class I
None Scheduled
B. Class II
None Scheduled
C. Class III
None Scheduled
D. Class IV
None Scheduled
E. Consistency
None Scheduled
VII. PUBLIC NOTICE AGENDA
A. Proof of Public Notice
B. Class II
1. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1188
Project Name: Arlington at Northwood
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location: On the south side of S.R. 56, approximately 2,000 feet west of C.R. 581, Section 36, Township 26 South, Range 19 East.
Acreage: 43.4 Acres, m.o.l. (Total 126.45 Acres)
Proposed Development: To construct a 312-unit apartment complex with amenities.
RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the June 10, 2004, Development Review Committee meeting in Dade City.
2. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1189
Project Name: Columns at Seven Springs
Commissioner: The Honorable Ann Hildebrand
Location: On the east side of Seven Springs Boulevard and approximately 1,300 feet north of Perrine Ranch Road, Section 27, Township 26 South, Range 16 East.
Acreage: 18.9 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: To construct a 390-unit apartment complex with amenities.
RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the April 29, 2004, Development Review Committee meeting in New Port Richey.
3. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1190
Project Name: Eagle's Nest Condominiums Hangar Expansion
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location: On the south side of Birdsong Boulevard, approximately 0.7 mile southeast of Wesley Chapel Boulevard, Section 14, Township 26 South, Range 19 East.
Acreage: 30.52 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: To demolish some of the existing buildings and construct 8 buildings/72 hangar spaces.
RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the April 29, 2004, Development Review Committee meeting in New Port Richey.
4. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1191
Project Name: Florida Youth Conservation Corps
Commissioner: The Honorable Ted Schrader
Location: On the west side of Thorn Haven Lane, approximately 2,000 feet west of Power Line Road, Section 04, Township 24 South, Range 21 East.
Acreage: 40.24 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: To construct six additional buildings having 4,936 square feet, existing and proposed building space totals 5,896 square feet.
RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the April 29, 2004, Development Review Committee meeting in New Port Richey.
C. Class III
1. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1075
Project Name: Grand Oaks, Phase 3
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location: On the south side of Grand Oaks Boulevard, approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of C.R. 54 and Grand Oaks Boulevard, Sections 14 and 15, Township 26 South, Range 19 East.
Acreage: 78.537 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The developer is requesting to modify the previously approved Condition No. 19 to allow for the relocation of the entrance road into its development.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
2. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1163
Project Name: Hamilton Park Subdivision
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location: On the north side of S.R. 54 at the intersection of S.R. 54 and New River Road, Section 13, Township 26 South, Range 20 East.
Acreage: 31.77 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The developer is requesting preliminary plan approval to divide 31.77 acres into 105 single-family detached lots.
RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the July 15, 2004, Development Review Committee meeting, at 1:30 p.m., in New Port Richey.
3. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1168
Project Name: Lake Vienna
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location: On the west side of U.S. 41, approximately one-quarter mile north of S.R. 54, Section 24, Township 26 South, Range 18 East.
Acreage: 46.06 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The applicant requests approval of the preliminary plan to subdivide 46.06 acres into 43 single-family detached lots.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
4. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1166
Project Name: Timberwoods Estates, First Addition
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location: On the west side of Hays Road, approximately one-quarter mile south of Oakwood Drive, Section 23, Township 24 South, Range 17 East.
Acreage: 30.56 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The developer
seeks approval of the preliminary/
construction plan and Stormwater Management Plan and Report to subdivide
30.56 acres into 13 single-family lots. Under a separate cover, the
applicant seeks a variance from Section 602.5 (Tree Location Survey, Tree
Plan) and Section 602.7 (Tree Removal and Replacement).
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
Pages: 75-114
VIII. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Class II
None Scheduled
B. Class III
1. Memorandum No.: GM04‑815
Project Name: Suncoast Crossings MPUD Master Planned Unit Development
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location: South Central Pasco at Suncoast Parkway and S.R. 54, Sections 30, 31, and 32, Township 26 South, Range 16 East.
Acreage: 688.9 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: Townhouse standards revision.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
2. Memorandum No.: GM04‑778
Project Name: Comas Trust MPUD Master Planned Unit Development
Commissioner: The Honorable Ted Schrader
Location: Central Pasco County, abutting the east side of C.R. 577 (Curley Road), approximately 1˝ miles northeast of the intersection of S.R. 54 and C.R. 577, extending east to Handcart Road, approximately one mile north of the intersection of Handcart Road and Eiland Boulevard, Sections 31, 34, 35, and 36, Township 25 South, Range 20 East; and Sections 31, 34, 35, and 36, Township 25 South, Range 21 East.
Acreage: 1,036.44 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The developers have submitted a request to rezone from A‑C Agricultural to MPUD Master Planned Unit Development.
RECOMMENDATION: Continue to the April 29, 2004, Development Review Committee meeting in New Port Richey.
3. Memorandum No.: GM04‑783
Project Name: Lake Jovita MPUD Master Planned Unit Development
(Continued from the March 25, 2004, Development Review Committee Meeting)
Commissioner: The Honorable Ted Schrader
Location: North of and abutting S.R. 52, approximately one-half mile west of Happy Hill Road (C.R. 579), Section 01, Township 25 South, Range 20 East; Section 06, Township 25 South, Range 21 East; Section 31, Township 24 South, Range 21 East; and Section 36, Township 24 South, Range 20 East.
Acreage: 903.26 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The developer is requesting to amend the previously approved MPUD Master Planned Unit Development.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
C. Class IV
None Scheduled
D. Utilities
None Scheduled
IX. CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS
None Scheduled
Pages: 115-142
X. DISCUSSION
A. Discussion of Policy Issues
1. Discussion on Well and Septic Systems
2. Traffic Study Guidelines ‑ GM04-617
Pages: 143-168
XI. INFORMATION
None Scheduled
XII. NOTED ITEMS
A. Class I Development Actions from March 24, 2004, to April 7, 2004:
1. Memorandum No.: DR04‑737
Project Name: Wachovia Bank at Collier Commons
Commissioner: The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant: Wachovia Bank
Location: Approximately 625 feet northwest of S.R. 54 and Collier Parkway intersection, Section 30, Township 26 South, Range 18 East.
Acreage: 0.95 Acre, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: Bank with five drive-through teller lanes.
Type of Action: Approval.
Date of Action: March 24, 2004
2. Memorandum No.: DR04‑1169
Project Name: Colonial Bank at Mitchell Ranch Plaza
Commissioner: The Honorable Ann Hildebrand
Applicant: Colonial Bank
Location: South side of S.R. 54, approximately 800 feet east of Little Road/S.R. 54 intersection (Out-Parcel 10, Mitchell Ranch Plaza), Section 24, Township 26 South, Range 16 East.
Acreage: 1.33 Acres Total
Proposed Development: Bank with three drive-through teller lanes
Type of Action: Approval.
Date of Action: April 7, 2004`
B. Class IIIE Development Actions
None Scheduled
C. Class IIIR Development Actions
None Scheduled