DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
A G E N D A
_______________________________________________________________________________________
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE
John J. Gallagher
Michael Nurrenbrock
OMB Director
Douglas S. Bramlett
Assistant
(Utilities Services)
Daniel R. Johnson
Assistant
(Public Services)
Bipin Parikh, P.E.
Assistant
(Development Services)
Michael Rapp
District School Board of
LEGAL
COUNSEL
Robert D. Sumner
ADVISORY
STAFF
Cynthia M. Jolly, P.E.
Development Director
Debra M. Zampetti
Zoning/Code Compliance
Administrator
Ronald G. Lewis, P.E.
Development Review Manager
Samuel P. Steffey II
Growth Management Administrator
James C. Widman, P.E.
Engineering Services Director
Representative of the Clerk
of the Circuit Court
________________________________________________________________________________________
I.
OPENING
II.
ROLL CALL
III.
MINUTES
IV.
VARIANCE
PETITIONS
A.
Public
Hearing
Proof of Publication
B.
Variance
Review
The Development Review Committee may grant a variance from
the terms of the Land Development Code when such variance will not be contrary
to the public interest; where, owing to special conditions, a literal
enforcement of the provisions of this code would result in unnecessary hardship
or where improved or alternative technology would meet or exceed the development
and construction standards set forth in this code. Such variance shall
not be granted if it has the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this
code.
Furthermore, such variance shall not be granted by the Development Review
Committee unless and until a variance application is submitted demonstrating
compliance with one or more of the following:
1.
That special conditions and circumstances exist which are
peculiar to the land, structures, or required subdivision improvements involved,
and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or required
improvements.
2.
That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this
code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties
with similar conditions.
3.
That the actions of the applicant did not cause the special
conditions and circumstances which necessitate the variance.
4.
That the granting of the variance requested will not confer
on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this code to other
lands, structures, or required improvements under similar conditions.
5.
Through improved or alternative technology, the development
and construction standards set forth in this code are met or exceeded.
6.
The Development Review Committee finds that the
requirements of this code have been met based upon the review and findings of
the Development Review Services Department and information presented at a public
hearing.
7.
The Development Review Committee further finds that the
reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance that
would make possible the reasonable use of the land, buildings, or other
improvements.
8.
The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of
the variance would be in harmony with the general standards, purpose, and intent
of this code and will not be injurious to the surrounding territory, or
otherwise be detrimental to the public welfare.
9.
The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of
the variance would not violate the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
a.
Memorandum No.:
DR04-067
Project Name:
Commissioner:
The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant:
Interplan, LLC
Location:
On the north side of Weeks Boulevard, approximately 300 feet west of
Acreage:
1.7 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed
Development:
School with playground.
Requested:
Variance from Section 10 of Pasco County Landscaping and Irrigation
Ordinance No. 02-04, which, if approved, would reduce the width of a
required Type "B" buffer.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with conditions.
b.
Memorandum No.:
DR04-261
Project Name:
Blueberry Hill Subdivision
Commissioner:
The Honorable Ted Schrader
Applicant:
Claire Clements
Location:
On the west side of
Acreage:
86.78 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development: The
developer is proposing to subdivide 86.78 acres into seven single-family
lots.
Requested:
The applicant is requesting a variance from Tree Protection and
Restoration Ordinance No. 03-02 (i.e. Tree Replacement).
RECOMMENDATION:
Withdrawal.