DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE, PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA
A G E N D A
FEBRUARY 20, 2003
1:30 p.m. - West Pasco Government Center, Board Room,
7530 Little Road, New Port Richey, FL 34654-5598
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
John J. Gallagher
County Administrator
Michael Nurrenbrock
OMB Director
Douglas S. Bramlett
Assistant County Administrator
(Utilities Services)
Daniel R. Johnson
Assistant County Administrator
(Public Services)
Bipin Parikh, P.E.
Assistant County Administrator
(Development Services)
LEGAL COUNSEL
Robert D. Sumner
County Attorney
ADVISORY STAFF
Cynthia M. Jolly, P.E.
Development Director
Debra M. Zampetti
Zoning/Code Compliance
Administrator
Ronald G. Lewis, P.E.
Development Review Manager
Samuel P. Steffey II
Growth Management Administrator
James C. Widman, P.E.
Engineering Services Director
Representative of the Clerk
of the Circuit Court
I.
OPENING
II.
ROLL CALL
III.
MINUTES
None Scheduled
IV.
VARIANCE PETITIONS
A.
Public Hearing
Proof of Publication
B.
Variance Review
The Development Review Committee may grant a variance from the terms of the Land Development Code when such variance will not be contrary to the public interest; where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this code would result in unnecessary hardship or where improved or alternative technology would meet or exceed the development and construction standards set forth in this code. Such variance shall not be granted if it has the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this code. Furthermore, such variance shall not be granted by the Development Review Committee unless and until a variance application is submitted demonstrating compliance with one or more of the following:
1.
That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structures, or required subdivision improvements involved, and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or required improvements.
2.
That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties with similar conditions.
3.
That the actions of the applicant did not cause the special conditions and circumstances which necessitate the variance.
4.
That the granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this code to other lands, structures, or required improvements under similar conditions.
5.
Through improved or alternative technology, the development and construction standards set forth in this code are met or exceeded.
6.
The Development Review Committee finds that the requirements of this code have been met based upon the review and findings of the Development Review Services Department and information presented at a public hearing.
7.
The Development Review Committee further finds that the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance that would make possible the reasonable use of the land, buildings, or other improvements.
8.
The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of the variance would be in harmony with the general standards, purpose, and intent of this code and will not be injurious to the surrounding territory, or otherwise be detrimental to the public welfare.
9.
The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of the variance would not violate the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
a.
Petition No.:
1729
Applicants:
Rancho Del Ciervo Estates, Mitchell Berg, and Nicole Scarbrough
Commissioner:
The Honorable Steve Simon
Location:
On the south side of Spicer Court, approximately 250 feet south of Sycamore Drive, Section 25, Township 25 South, Range 16 East.
Acreage:
1.05 Acres, m.o.l.
Present Zoning:
E-R Estate-Residential
Land Use:
RES-1 (Residential - 1 du/ga)
Requested:
A reduction in the required minimum front setback from 50 feet to 35 feet and a reduction in the required minimum east and west side setbacks from 25 feet to 10 feet.
RECOMMENDATION:
b.
Petition No.:
1730
Applicant:
Terry L. Bechtel
Commissioner:
The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location:
On the east side of Cannonade Drive, approximately 100 feet south of Gallant Fox Court, within the Lexington Oaks Subdivision, Phase 1, Section 11, Township 26 South, Range 19 East.
Acreage:
.11 Acre, m.o.l.
Present Zoning:
MPUD Master Planned Unit Development
Land Use:
RES-3 (Residential - 3 du/ga)
Requested:
A reduction in the required minimum rear setback from five feet to two feet for a screened porch.
RECOMMENDATION:
Denial.
c.
Petition No.:
1731
Applicant:
John A. Verscharen
Commissioner:
The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location:
On the north side of Southshore Drive, approximately 500 feet east of Gulfwind Drive, Section 19, Township 26 South, Range 19 East.
Acreage:
.35 Acre, m.o.l.
Present Zoning:
PUD Planned Unit Development
Land Use:
RES-6 (Residential - 6 du/ga)
Requested:
A reduction in the required minimum east side setback from five feet to three feet for a detached garage.
RECOMMENDATION:
Denial.
d.
Petition No.:
1732
Applicant:
Davert, Inc.
Commissioner:
The Honorable Steve Simon
Location:
On the east side of Moon Lake Road, approximately 150 feet southwest of Hialeah Avenue, Section 04, Township 25 South, Range 17 East.
Acreage:
.8 Acre, m.o.l.
Present Zoning:
C-2 General Commercial
Land Use:
RES-3 (Residential - 3 du/ga)
Requested:
A reduction in the required clear-zone setback of 100 feet, plus the required front zoning setback of 25 feet, totaling 125 feet to 69 feet from the centerline of Moon Lake Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with conditions.
e.
Memorandum No.:
DR03-745
Project Name:
Tom Drive Subdivision
Commissioner
The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Applicant:
We Shelter America, Inc.
Location:
On the northwest corner of Causeway Boulevard and Tom Drive, Section 34, Township 25 South, Range 18 East.
Acreage:
4.81 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development:
Division of 4.81 acres into six single-family lots.
Requested:
The developer is requesting a variance for Section 306.10, Record Plat Review.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with conditions.
f.
Memorandum No.:
DR03-476
Project Name:
Walgreens - S.R. 54 and Seven Springs Variance
Commissioner
The Honorable Ann Hildebrand
Applicant:
RKM Development Corporation
Location:
On the southeast corner of the intersection of S.R. 54 and Seven Springs Boulevard, Section 22, Township 26 South, Range 16 East.
Acreage:
1.338 Acres
Proposed Development:
The corporation now desires to increase the existing 24-foot driveway abutting S.R. 54 to a 36-foot driveway on this existing (15,120-square foot) pharmacy with drive through.
Requested:
A variance from Sections 7, 8, and 10 of Pasco County Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance No. 02-04 which, if granted, would allow the developer to retain 52 of its originally approved 55 parking spaces. If the landscape variance is denied, the total parking spaces would be reduced to 22. Therefore, the site would not meet the parking criteria per Section 615 of the Land Development Code which requires a minimum of 51 parking spaces (1 space per 300 square feet).
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with conditions.
Pages: 1-60
V.
APPEALS
A.
Class I
None Scheduled
B.
Class II
None Scheduled
C.
Class III
None Scheduled
D.
Class IV
None Scheduled
E.
Consistency
None Scheduled
VI.
PUBLIC NOTICE AGENDA
A.
Proof of Public Notice
B.
Class II
1.
Memorandum No.:
DR03-736
Project Name:
Auld Lane Yard Mulch and Recycling
Commissioner:
The Honorable Ann Hildebrand
Location:
On the south side of Auld Lane, approximately 220 feet east of Grand Boulevard, Section 29, Township 26 South, Range 16 East.
Acreage:
20.57 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development:
To construct a yard mulch and recycling facility.
RECOMMENDATION:
Continue to the March 27, 2003, Development Review Committee meeting in New Port Richey.
2.
Memorandum No.:
DR03-737
Project Name:
Seven Oaks, Parcel S-22 Apartments
Commissioner:
The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location:
On the north side of S.R. 56 and approximately 4,800 feet east of I-75, Section 25, Township 26 South, Range 19 East.
Acreage:
20.01 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development:
To construct a 318-unit apartment complex with amenities.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with conditions.
Pages 61-68
C.
Class III
1.
Memorandum No.:
DR03-743
Project Name:
Cypress Highlands, Increment 1
Commissioner:
The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location:
On the north side of S.R. 54, approximately one-half mile east of the intersection of S.R. 54 and Meadowbrook Drive, Sections 17, 20, and 29, Township 26 South, Range 18 East.
Acreage:
226.2 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development:
The developer is requesting preliminary plan approval to divide 226.2 acres into 478 single-family lots.
RECOMMENDATION:
Continue to the March 6, 2003, Development Review Committee meeting in New Port Richey.
Pages 69-70
VII.
REGULAR AGENDA
A.
Class II
None Scheduled
B.
Class III
1.
Memorandum No.:
DR03-744
Project Name:
Tom Drive Subdivision
(Continued from the February 6, 2003, Development Review Committee Meeting)
Commissioner:
The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.
Location:
On the northwest corner of Causeway Boulevard and Tom Drive, Section 34, Township 25 South, Range 18 East.
Acreage:
4.81 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development:
Approval of the Preliminary Plan, Construction Plan, and Stormwater Management Plan and Report for the division of 4.81 acres into six single-family lots.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with conditions.
Pages 71-78
C.
Class IV
None Scheduled
D.
Utilities
None Scheduled
VIII.
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS
None Scheduled
IX.
DISCUSSION
A.
Discussion of Policy Issues
1.
Memorandum No.:
DR03-720
Subject:
Access Management Standards
Pages 79-101
X.
INFORMATION
None Scheduled
XI.
NOTED ITEMS
A.
Class I Development Actions from February 5, 2003, to February 12, 2003:
1.
Memorandum No.:
DR03-323
Project Name:
Sun Toyota Service Center
Commissioner:
The Honorable Ann Hildebrand
Applicant:
Sun Toyota, Inc.
Location:
On the northwest corner of the intersection of S.R. 54 and Grand Boulevard, Section 17, Township 26 South, Range 16 East.
Acreage:
6.68 Acres, m.o.l.
Proposed Development:
Sales Office and Warehouse/Service
Type of Action:
Approval with conditions.
Date of Action:
February 7, 2003
B.
Class IIIE Development Actions
None Scheduled
C.
Class IIIR Development Actions
None Scheduled