DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA

A G E N D A

MARCH 7, 2002

1:30 p.m. - West Pasco Government Center, Board Room,

7530 Little Road, New Port Richey, FL 34654-5598

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE

John J. Gallagher

County Administrator

Michael Nurrenbrock

OMB Director

Douglas S. Bramlett

Assistant County Administrator

(Utilities Services)

Daniel R. Johnson

Assistant County Administrator

(Public Services)

Bipin Parikh, P.E.

Assistant County Administrator

(Development Services)

LEGAL COUNSEL

Robert D. Sumner

County Attorney

ADVISORY STAFF

Cynthia M. Jolly, P.E.

Development Director

Debra M. Zampetti

Zoning/Code Compliance

Administrator

Paul J. Montante

Acting Development Review Manager

Samuel P. Steffey II

Growth Management Administrator

James C. Widman, P.E.

Engineering Services Director

Representative of the Clerk

of the Circuit Court

I.

OPENING

II.

ROLL CALL

III.

MINUTES

None Scheduled

IV.

VARIANCE PETITIONS

A.

Public Hearing

Proof of Publication

B.

Variance Review

The Development Review Committee may grant a variance from the terms of the Land Development Code when such variance will not be contrary to the public interest; where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this code would result in unnecessary hardship or where improved or alternative technology would meet or exceed the development and construction standards set forth in this code.  Such variance shall not be granted if it has the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this code.  Furthermore, such variance shall not be granted by the Development Review Committee unless and until a variance application is submitted demonstrating compliance with one or more of the following:

1.

That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structures, or required subdivision improvements involved, and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or required improvements.

2.

That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties with similar conditions.

3.

That the actions of the applicant did not cause the special conditions and circumstances which necessitate the variance.

4.

That the granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this code to other lands, structures, or required improvements under similar conditions.

5.

Through improved or alternative technology, the development and construction standards set forth in this code are met or exceeded.

6.

The Development Review Committee finds that the requirements of this code have been met based upon the review and findings of the Development Review Services Department and information presented at a public hearing.

7.

The Development Review Committee further finds that the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance that would make possible the reasonable use of the land, buildings, or other improvements.

8.

The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of the variance would be in harmony with the general standards, purpose, and intent of this code and will not be injurious to the surrounding territory, or otherwise be detrimental to the public welfare.

9.

The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of the variance would not violate the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.

a.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-639

Project Name:

Summertree, Parcels 1B and 4

Commissioner

The Honorable Steve Simon

Applicant:

Summertree Development Three, Inc.

Location:

On the north and south sides of Paradise Pointe Way, approximately 900 feet south of the intersec­tion of S.R. 52 and Paradise Pointe Way, Sec­tion 05, Town­ship 25 South, Range 17 East.

Acreage:

18.73 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

The developer is requesting approval of the prelimi­nary plan to divide 18.73 acres into 80 single-family attached lots.

Requested:

Relief from the Land Development Code, Section 306.17, Dedication, which, if approved, would allow the developer to utilize private streets.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval with conditions.

Pages:  1-6

V.

APPEALS

A.

Class I

None Scheduled

B.

Class II

None Scheduled

C.

Class III

None Scheduled

D.

Class IV

None Scheduled

E.

Consistency

None Scheduled

VI.

PUBLIC NOTICE AGENDA

A.

Proof of Public Notice

B.

Class II

1.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-650

Project Name:

Bishop McLaughlin Catholic High School

(Continued from the February 21, 2002, Development Review Committee Meeting)

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Location:

On the west side of Hayes Road, south of Hudson Avenue, Sec­tion 36, Town­ship 24 South, Range 17 East.

Acreage:

89.7 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

155,296-square-foot high school and amenities.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval with conditions.

2.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-651

Project Name:

Great Bay Distributors Expansion

Commissioner:

The Honorable Ann Hildebrand

Location:

On the west side of Grand Boulevard, south of Moog Road, Sec­­tion 20, Town­­ship 26 South, Range 16 East.

Acreage:

9.6 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

Expanding office, warehouse, and maintenance space  28,246 square feet, for a total of 61,746 square feet.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval with conditions.

3.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-652

Project Name:

Trinity Office Park

(Continued from the January 24, 2002, Development Review Committee Meeting)

Commissioner:

The Honorable Ann Hildebrand

Location:

On the south side of Mitchell Boulevard, approximately 500 feet west of the Little Road intersection, Sec­­tion 35, Town­­ship 26 South, Range 16 East.

Acreage:

8.9 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

The applicant is requesting approval to construct bank and medical office buildings, totaling 71,500 square feet.

RECOMMENDATION:

Continue to the April 18, 2002, Development Review Com­mittee meeting in New Port Richey.

Pages:  7-22

C.

Class III

1.

Memorandum No.:

GM02-567

Project Name:

Cypress Creek Comprehensive Plan Amendment

(Continued from the Following Development Review Com­mittee Meetings:  November 1, 2001; November 15, 2001; December 6, 2001; January 24, 2002; February 7, 2002; and February 21, 2002)

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Location:

Bordering I-75 to the east, approximately one mile north of the Pasco-Hillsborough County Line, Sec­tion 26, Town­ship 26 South, Range 19 East.

Acreage:

404 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

Development of Regional Impact.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval with conditions.

2.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-640

Project Name:

Summertree, Parcels 1B and 4

Commissioner:

The Honorable Steve Simon

Location:

On the north and south sides of Paradise Pointe Way, approximately 900 feet south of the intersection of S.R. 52 and Paradise Pointe Way, Sec­tion 05, Town­ship 25 South, Range 17 East.

Acreage:

18.73 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

The developer is requesting approval of the preliminary plan to divide 18.73 acres into 80 single-family attached lots.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval with conditions.

Pages:  23-34

VII.

REGULAR AGENDA

A.

Class II

None Scheduled

B.

Class III

None Scheduled

C.

Class IV

None Scheduled

D.

Utilities

None Scheduled

VIII.

CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS

None Scheduled

IX.

DISCUSSION

None Scheduled

X.

INFORMATION

None Scheduled

XI.

NOTED ITEMS

A.

Class I Development Actions

None Scheduled

B.

Class I Development Actions from February 18, 2002, to March 4, 2002:

1.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-594

Project Name:

Bonzer Chicken

Commissioner:

The Honorable Steve Simon

Applicant:

Jim McConnell

Location:

On the north side of Embassy Boulevard at Shoppers Way, approximately 1,000 feet east of U.S. 19, Sec­tion 21, Town­ship 25 South, Range 16 East.

Acreage:

2.66 Acres

Proposed Development:

8,161-square-foot restaurant with drive-through.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

February 18, 2002

2.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-572

Project Name:

Celebration Church of God Coffee and Ice Cream Shops

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Applicant:

Celebration Church of God

Location:

On the south side of S.R. 54, opposite Lake Bernadette Boulevard, Sec­­tion 17, Town­­ship 26 South, Range 20 East.

Acreage:

14.57 Acres (Total Church Site)

Proposed Development:

Coffee and ice cream shops.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

February 18, 2002

3.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-596

Project Name:

Meadow Pointe First Baptist Church of New Tampa

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Applicant:

First Baptist Church of New Tampa

Location:

On the north side of County Line Road, approximately one-quarter mile east of C.R. 581, Sec­­tion 31, Town­­ship 26 South, Range 20 East.

Acreage:

1.866 Acres

Proposed Development:

3,200-square-foot Sunday school and kids' church, with future weekday preschool.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

February 18, 2002

4.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-003

Project Name:

U.S. Commercial S.R. 52

Commissioner:

The Honorable Peter Altman

Applicant:

U.S. Commercial

Location:

On the north side of S.R. 52, approximately 750 feet west of Parkwood Street, Sec­­tion 01, Town­­ship 25 South, Range 16 East.

Acreage:

1.76 Acres

Proposed Development:

8,000-square-foot office/retail.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

February 28, 2002

5.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-586

Project Name:

Keys Concrete Plan - Upgrade

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Applicant:

Keys Concrete Industries

Location:

South side of County Line Road, approximately two miles west of the Suncoast Parkway, Sec­­tion 04, Town­­ship 24 South, Range 18 East.

Acreage:

4.87 Acres, Actual

Proposed Development:

Truck drum wash; areas for rock, sand, and recycled concrete storage; slump/wash racks, etc.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

March 4, 2002