DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE, PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA

A G E N D A

FEBRUARY 21, 2002


1:30 p.m. - West Pasco Government Center, Board Room,

7530 Little Road, New Port Richey, FL 34654-5598



DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE


John J. Gallagher

County Administrator

Michael Nurrenbrock

OMB Director

Douglas S. Bramlett

Assistant County Administrator

(Utilities Services)

Daniel R. Johnson

Assistant County Administrator

(Public Services)

Bipin Parikh, P.E.

Assistant County Administrator

(Development Services)


LEGAL COUNSEL


Robert D. Sumner

County Attorney


ADVISORY STAFF


Cynthia M. Jolly, P.E.

Development Director

Debra M. Zampetti

Zoning/Code Compliance

Administrator

Paul J. Montante

Acting Development Review Manager

Samuel P. Steffey II

Growth Management Administrator

Gregory T. Riski, P.E.

Assistant Engineering Services Director

Representative of the Clerk

of the Circuit Court

****   *   *   *   ***   *   *   *   *   ***   *   *   *   *   ***   *   *   *   *   ***   *   *   *   *   ***   *   *   *   *   ****   *   *   *   ****


I.

OPENING


II.

ROLL CALL


III.

MINUTES


December 6, 2001


Pages 1-27


December 20, 2001


Pages 1-21


IV.

VARIANCE PETITIONS


A.

Public Hearing


Proof of Publication


B.

Variance Review


The Development Review Committee may grant a variance from the terms of the Land Development Code when such variance will not be contrary to the public interest; where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this code would result in unnecessary hardship or where improved or alternative technology would meet or exceed the development and construction standards set forth in this code.  Such variance shall not be granted if it has the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this code.  Furthermore, such variance shall not be granted by the Development Review Committee unless and until a variance application is submitted demonstrating compliance with one or more of the following:


1.

That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structures, or required subdivision improvements involved, and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or required improvements.


2.

That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties with similar conditions.


3.

That the actions of the applicant did not cause the special conditions and circumstances which necessitate the variance.


4.

That the granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this code to other lands, structures, or required improvements under similar conditions.


5.

Through improved or alternative technology, the development and construction standards set forth in this code are met or exceeded.


6.

The Development Review Committee finds that the requirements of this code have been met based upon the review and findings of the Development Review Services Department and information presented at a public hearing.


7.

The Development Review Committee further finds that the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance that would make possible the reasonable use of the land, buildings, or other improvements.


8.

The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of the variance would be in harmony with the general standards, purpose, and intent of this code and will not be injurious to the surrounding territory, or otherwise be detrimental to the public welfare.


9.

The Development Review Committee finds that the granting of the variance would not violate the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.


a.

Petition No.:

1665

Applicants:

Scott and Susan E. Blackman

Commissioner:

The Honorable Ted Schrader

Location:

On the south side of Orange Row Lane, approxi­mately 1,350 feet east of Orange Tree Road, Sec­tion 10, Town­ship 25 South, Range 21 East.

Acreage:

1.06 Acres, m.o.l.

Present Zoning:

E-R Estate-Residential

Land Use:

RES-3 (Residential - 3 du/ga)

Requested:

A reduction in the required minimum east-side setback from 25'  to 20'2" for an attached garage.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval with conditions.


b.

Petition No.:

1666

Applicant:

Evelyn V. Womack

Commissioner:

The Honorable Steve Simon

Location:

On the west side of Rowan Road, approximately 800 feet south of Nebraska Avenue, Sec­tion 03, Town­ship 26 South, Range 16 East.

Acreage:

.90 Acre, m.o.l.

Present Zoning:

A-R Agricultural-Residential

Land Use:

ROR (Retail/Office/Residential)

Requested:

A reduction in the minimum required lot area from two acres to .90 acre for two dwellings.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval with conditions.


Pages:  1-14


V.

APPEALS


A.

Class I


None Scheduled


B.

Class II


None Scheduled


C.

Class III


None Scheduled


D.

Class IV


None Scheduled


E.

Consistency


None Scheduled


VI.

PUBLIC NOTICE AGENDA


A.

Proof of Public Notice


B.

Class II


1.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-575

Project Name:

Bishop McLaughlin Catholic High School

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Location:

On the west side of Hays Road, south of Hudson Avenue, Sec­tion 36, Town­ship 24 South, Range 17 East.

Acreage:

89.7 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

A school complex totaling 155,296 square feet.

RECOMMENDATION:

Continue to the March 7, 2002, Development Review Committee meeting, New Port Richey.


Pages:  15-17


C.

Class III


1.

Memorandum No.:

GM02-536

Project Name:

Cypress Creek Comprehensive Plan Amendment

(Continued from the November 1, 2001, November 15, 2001, December 6, 2001, and January 24, 2002, Develop­ment Review Committee Meetings)

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Location:

Borders I-75 to the east and is approximately one mile north of the Pasco-Hillsborough County line, Sec­tion 26, Town­ship 26 South, Range 19 East.

Acreage:

404 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

Development of Regional Impact.

RECOMMENDATION:

Continue to the March 7, 2002, Development Review Committee meeting, New Port Richey.


2.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-587

Project Name:

Hunter's Lake, Phase Two

Commissioner:

The Honorable Steve Simon

Location:

Hunters Lake Drive, west of Moon Lake Road, Sec­­tion 04, Town­­ship 25 South, Range 17 East.

Acreage:

10.84 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

The developer is requesting preliminary plan approval for the division of 10.83 acres into 46 single-family lots.

RECOMMENDATION:

Continue to the April 4, 2002, Development Review Com­mittee meeting, Dade City.


3.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-577

Project Name:

Meadow Pointe, Parcel 16, Units 3A and 3B

(Continued from the February 7, 2002, Development Re­view Committee Meeting)

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Location:

On the southeast corner of Mansfield Boulevard and Beardsley Drive, Sec­­tion 33, Town­­ship 26 South, Range 20 East.

Acreage:

51.28 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

The developer is requesting preliminary/construction plan and Stormwater Management Plan and Report approval for the division of 51.28 acres into 253 single-family lots.

RECOMMENDATION:

Continue to the March 21, 2002, Development Review Committee meeting, Dade City.


4.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-576

Project Name:

Ross Tract

(Continued from the December 6, 2001, December 20, 2001, and February 7, 2002, Development Review Commit­tee Meetings)

Commissioner:

The Honorable Ann Hildebrand

Location:

On the west side of the proposed Welbilt Boulevard Expan­sion, approximately 3,000 feet north of Mitchell Road, Sec­­tions 26 and 27, Town­­ship 26 South, Range 16 East.

Acreage:

95.96 Acres, m.o.l.

Proposed Development:

The developer is requesting preliminary/construction plan approval for the division of 95.96 acres into 218 single-family lots.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approval with conditions.


Pages:  19-37


VII.

REGULAR AGENDA


A.

Class II


1.

Cypress Walk Revised Developer's Agreement

(Continued from the February 7, 2002, Development Review Committee Meeting, Dade City)


Pages:  39-80


B.

Class III


None Scheduled


C.

Class IV


None Scheduled


D.

Utilities


None Scheduled


VIII.

CONSISTENCY DETERMINATIONS


None Scheduled


IX.

DISCUSSION


A.

Discussion of Policy Issues


1.

GPS Control Points - Addition to the Standard Conditions of Approval


Page:  81


X.

INFORMATION


None Scheduled


XI.

NOTED ITEMS


A.

Class I Development Actions from February 1, 2002, to February 15, 2002:


1.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-474

Project Name:

Christian Church of Elfers

Commissioner:

The Honorable Ann Hildebrand

Applicant:

Christian Church of Holiday

Location:

One-quarter mile west of Madison Street, at the southwest  corner of Rochester Parkway and S.R. 54, Sec­tion 20, Town­ship 26 South, Range 16 East.

Acreage:

2.187 Acres, Actual

Proposed Development:

Church with future classrooms totaling 10,500 square feet.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

February 1, 2002


2.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-406

Project Name:

Architectural Services and Engineering, Inc.

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Applicant:

Xerri, LLC

Location:

250 feet south of S.R. 54 and 150 feet east of Carpenters Run, Sec­­tion 33, Town­­ship 26 South, Range 19 East.

Acreage:

.264 Acre, Actual

Proposed Development:

3,000-square-foot office building.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

February 7, 2002


3.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-405

Project Name:

Organization Meeting Building

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Applicant:

R. M. Lee Development Company

Location:

Two miles east of U.S. 19, on the south side of County Line Road, in the County Line Road Trade Center, Sec­­tion 04, Town­­ship 24 South, Range 17 East.

Acreage:

.51 Acre, Actual

Proposed Development:

2,400-square-foot club meeting building.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

February 12, 2002


4.

Memorandum No.:

DR02-409

Project Name:

Little Stars Day Care/ Office

Commissioner:

The Honorable Pat Mulieri, Ed.D.

Applicants:

Sophia Rosado and Roxanne Ortiz

Location:

On the south side of S.R. 54, approximately 300 feet east of Gray Road, Sec­­tion 09, Town­­ship 26 South, Range 20 East.

Acreage:

1.03 Acres, Actual

Proposed Development:

7,000-square-foot day care/office building.

Type of Action:

Approval.

Date of Action:

February 13, 2002


B.

Class IIIE Development Actions


None Scheduled


C.

Class IIIR Development Actions


None Scheduled

mo/a021304/48